![]() If you don't supply one, I doubt you would get fired but why push it over this issue. Ask a co-worker to snap a picture against a plain wall, and then send it in. If your company is in a business like that then it makes some sense to consider adding a photo to a signature block, but I would suggest that the full version with the picture not be the default version, thus keeping down the size of the average email chain.īut if they insist on going forward with this. Now it is true that for some business it is typical to see a photo on a business card. That makes it hard to find the emails that really do have attachments. It can also be frustrating if every email from a person with a complex signature block results in a paperclip icon that implies an attachment. They may also find that if they are sending emails to many corporate users the receiving email system may automatically convert the messages to non-html thus losing the impact of the photo. The presence of a photo in an email signature block just adds unnecessary size to each message. But that presence in the address book didn't result in the photo being sent to external customers. I have worked with some organizations that automatically added your badge photo to the email address book. I am surprised that the company wants photos. But photos without requirements can end up with non-professional photos being included in the email signatures. Signature block requirements can also enforce uniformity of messaging. ![]() ![]() When a person who has an email you sent but needs to call you, a well defined signature block gives them everything they need. In general your employer can set guidelines and requirements for email signatures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |